Home Main Category Announcements Lafayette Says SB79 Pushes Transit Hub Development Over Risk Posed By Wildfires

Lafayette Says SB79 Pushes Transit Hub Development Over Risk Posed By Wildfires

SHARE
Map provided by the City of Lafayette showing ¼ mile and ½ mile region around Lafayette BART station property where SB79 could allow dense housing development along with emergency evacuation zones (blue lines) and Fire Hazard Severity Zones (yellow and orange areas)

From the City of Lafayette:

Lafayette CA: The City of Lafayette is encouraging residents and local businesses to voice their concerns about the lack of evacuation safety measures in Senate Bill 79’s blanket approach to development around transit locations.

SB 79 (Wiener) would establish statewide transit-oriented development (TOD) zoning standards for properties near major transit stops (such as BART stations). The standards vary by County. In Contra Costa County developments that meet SB 79’s requirements would:

Qualify for ministerial approval with no public review.
Allow 80 units/acre and up to 55 foot tall buildings within ¼ mile of BART property.
Allow 60 units/acre and up to 35 foot tall buildings in areas further than ¼ mile but within ½ mile of BART property. (In Lafayette, this includes the Happy Valley and Glen neighborhoods to the north of the station and Moraga Boulevard and Brook Street neighborhoods to the south.)
Be allowed on any residential, mixed-use, or commercial property if the project complies with the tiered development criteria in the legislation.
Be allowed to build 100% market-rate units for developments of 10 units or less, with no requirements to build below-market rate or affordable housing.

“While we support California’s housing goals and are committed to seeing new residential development in proximity to the BART station, SB79’s statewide blanket approach does not account for unique local safety hazards such as narrow hillside roads and steep topography that have been locally identified as evacuation routes,” said Lafayette Mayor Susan Candell.

Today, the City of Lafayette encouraged community members who are concerned about SB79 allowing high density development in evacuation zones for neighborhoods with heightened wildfire hazards to write their State Representatives before Thursday, August 28, 2025. On their website, the City provided a sample letter and contact information for the California Assembly Appropriations Committee, Senator Tim Grayson (9th District) and Assembly Member Rebecca Bauer-Kahan (District 16).

In Lafayette, studies have estimated that evacuation times during a disaster such as a wildfire may exceed one hour, particularly for neighborhoods with steep, narrow roads and limited egress options to evacuate during a disaster. Increased density in these areas will add to the evacuation times, thereby placing residents at serious risk during emergencies such as a wildfire. Although Lafayette and Orinda are the only BART stations in Contra Costa County located in such compromised evacuation areas, there may be other communities elsewhere in the State with similar risks.

The Lafayette City Council’s legislative subcommittee has been working on this issue for months. In April, the City sent a letter to Sen. Weiner opposing the bill because SB79 would disregard state-certified housing elements and give land use authority to transit agencies like BART without regard to the community’s needs, environmental review, or public input. In June, the subcommittee visited Sacramento to highlight for legislators the proximity of high fire zones in neighborhoods near the Lafayette BART station.

“We support denser housing in the downtown but are deeply concerned that SB 79 promotes higher-density housing in designated evacuation zones that already have significant evacuation challenges due to narrow roadways and steep terrain,” said Lafayette Councilmember Jim Cervantes.

SB 79 may be heard by the Assembly Appropriations Committee on Friday, August 29 and apparently has a significant momentum. To address the very real fire risk issues, Lafayette’s legislative subcommittee has offered an amendment to exempt evacuation zones within SB 79’s TOD area that include High or Very High and High Fire Hazard Zones.

17 COMMENTS

  1. These short-sighted laws overriding local common sense will cause strong opposition to any new public transit projects. When you accept transit you will get urbanization, not immediately but inevitably. The developers bankrolling our legislators don’t care. They will be long gone with their profits.

  2. Hooooooooooowee! Housing is expensive here. I wonder why that is….
    I know, let’s build housing where there is no public transportation and no jobs. Let’s appropriate farmland an hour away from jobs and cover it with hardscape and grass lawns and multiplexes.

  3. Keep huffing the Nimby copium. We will cover your beloved slop-suburb in apartments and there’s nothing you can do about it.

      • Some folks just don’t listen to reason. (Mainly the folks who can’t bear to see their property appreciation slow down…)

        • Explain how some people “don’t listen to reason”? You must be part of one of these loser groups, who aren’t from around the area, but like to cause trouble. Lafayette has plenty of apartments and is building more than Orinda, Moraga and many nearby communities. Weinee has no idea what his lame AB’s are doing since he has an apartment in SF and could care less about existing homeowners, and impact on utilities, schools, first responders, etc. If the goal is for affordable housing, these developments do nothing to help with that.

          • Blah, blah, blah, we’re coming from your precious Prop 13 next too. Hopefully we can boot you to Texas in a few years like the rest of em.

          • Coming on strong today, WillB.

            For the record: Who’s “we?” And we’re going to have to pass on Texas, too, because of the humidity and because all our exes live there…

          • Hello! Moraga is 5 winding miles from any transit corridor. A different evacuation calculus applies. A BART line and a freeway are what make for a transit corridor…

          • “If the goal is for affordable housing, these developments do nothing to help with that.”
            You’ve got your supply, and you’ve got your demand…When supply rises, ceteris paribus, prices move lower. I accept that as axiomatic. Thank you, CAL.

          • “We” are the young’uns who are greatly P.O.’d at those unpleasant people known as the Homeowner’s Lobby, NIMBYs, and the like, who seem to be hell-bent to deny future people the same opportunities they once had, lest their Hoomer Lottery Ticket™ gravy train finally reach the end of the line.

            (You’re welcome to stay, Beloved Newsman… as a former Southwesterner myself, I’ve had enough humidity for a lifetime.)

  4. Will B – learn how to punctuate. And, as you were asked, out yourself. Moving to Texas will never happen.

    Agreed, Will definitely has his undies in a bunch today. Or perhaps he wasn’t breastfed or was dropped on his head as a baby.

    • “Or perhaps he wasn’t breastfed or was dropped on his head as a baby.”
      I don’t know anybody who didn’t have one of those 2 things happen to them…
      You are singing a minority chorus.

      • Are u Will’s mouthpiece?
        And I know where Moraga is located and what defines a transit corridor. My point was…forget it, don’t care to explain. Though, I will say, BART has had no interest in developing their lots. You probably don’t live anywhere around it, either.

Leave a Reply to Gregg Cancel reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here